silvester growdrobe Posted January 5, 2023 Share Posted January 5, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LHC Posted January 5, 2023 Share Posted January 5, 2023 (edited) In the end, the owners of uk420 can make the rules they want. And of course they have business contracts with the "sponsors" which I would guess involves moderating comments that could lead potential customers another direction. This I fully understand and respect. When I mentioned that Karmas main distributer had this amazing offer, I just didn´t think it would be a problem. Now I know it is. Anyway, I see that Karmas Sour D BX2 is Sour Diesel IBL X Biker Kush Bx2 So it is a Sour D cross and he has other crosses with Sour D that could be of interest. It also looks like a breeder collective called ApeOrigin has made a preservation runs with Karmas Sour D BX2. So that would be F2´s. Would be very interesting for a phenohunt. Looks like they are available, and very cheap also. I will of course obey the master and keep the name of the distributer a secret. Edited January 5, 2023 by LHC 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catweazle1 Posted January 5, 2023 Share Posted January 5, 2023 (edited) Karma's SD is it's own genotype according to Karma, so is it related to the Emerald Triangle originals? Edited January 6, 2023 by catweazle1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lux_Interior Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 47 minutes ago, LHC said: Looks like they are available, and very cheap also. I will of course obey the master and keep the name of the distributer a secret. I think it's Apple iSeeds from Tesco immobile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUFUS HOUND Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 (edited) hypothetical question? if I say a site sponsors seeds/ lights etc are shit will that be moderated ie removed and left in if I say the are great! I get the site sponsors should be given prime advertising space etc but not to exclude members from mentioning a deal that would benefit its member which if they are subscribers pay for their membership and so should be allowed to air there views and post deals to help members - this seems like some sort of selective monopoly. to me this is double standards Edited January 6, 2023 by RUFUS HOUND 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHAN Posted January 6, 2023 Author Share Posted January 6, 2023 It’s a bit of a strange one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now