Cambium Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 In your opinion... Also sport shooting isn't just for pleasure as you put it. It has a purpose in very few instances, but where it does, it only manages to pay for itself by attracting those that have a perverse enjoyment of shooting for sport. Just to add that the only reason why the gun option is the only option we have is because of our previous custodians bloodlust for sport shooting. If we hadn't shot most of the food web and then introduced invasives to continue the 'sport', we wouldn't need the gun as a solution. We are self perpetuating violence machines. The skills you talk about and the ability that it gives you to be a fulfilled human being can be achieved by practising many of the intuitive things that we have in us. Just saying like 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catfish Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Devil's Advocate. So you would all rather someone who WANTS the job as head of state President Blair President Thatcher President Johnson President Farage If one wishes to see the back of them, come up with a viable alternative for the position of "Head of State" Cheers why do we have a head of state ? i cant see the need for one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling-archer Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Keep them as a tourist attraction, scale down on the civil list and sub the ones people come to see. Didn't Johnny say 'those tourists are money' and they are. No sense in cutting off your cock to spite your balls imo Wed make more if we ditched the prats and opened all the palaces to the public as attractions like france did. Leeches they are nowt more. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catfish Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Roit. I just watched that vid and as entertaining and somewhat enlightening as it was I have some questions. Something that really interests me is land ownership and how it relates to power, and empowerment. In that video it states that the queen ownes six thousand million ha or something like that, claiming that she owns the UK, Canada, Australia etc... Now does she? Does she claim some kind of rent on them or profit from their use? Is she in the traditional sense of the word (which is the only one that matters), a landowner? If she 'owns' the UK does her 'ownership' supersede the Duke of Buccleuch ownership of what I presume he believes are his 270,900 acres. Or the Vlissingen's of letterewe and their sprawling acreage? How does she 'own' this land, if they also do? i think the queen is gods keeper of the land till a suitable hair come along or something ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling-archer Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 (edited) Devil's Advocate. So you would all rather someone who WANTS the job as head of state President Blair President Thatcher President Johnson President Farage If one wishes to see the back of them, come up with a viable alternative for the position of "Head of State" Cheers They do nowt why would ya need a good replacement,they have no impact on politics unless it's tory so bin them have a revolution and sort the lot out Titles dont change roles its just a title nowt more,the pms pulling the strings anyway but he could be called master and commander for all it matters,well pulling strings appart from his orders from above too most likely that they'd take..illuminati shit Edited November 16, 2014 by sterling-archer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catfish Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 I have a bit of issue with this... I've hunted since I was a boy (5yr old) and I don't think its made me a maladjust. In fact I'd go so far as to say that hunting teaches vital skills(imo) that todays youth are generally lacking and I think that we as a society are poorer for. maybe your correct but what skills will say shooting a male bull stag with a high powered rifle through a scope? . or even a rare animal for entertainment ? say shooting a tiger you can bet your cocks the royal family have shoot such animals . how many animals have been culled/murdered for sport ? its that i dont agree with. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughie Green Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Psychologists reckon that killing animals is the precursor to later psychopathic behaviour, if we use Harry as an example he went on to kill humans and thought it a jolly jape, once you have dehumanised the enemy they are as easy to kill as pheasants, label it a sport if you like but as noted in the video the dead animals don't see that distinction, they are just dead. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggles41 Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Wed make more if we ditched the prats and opened all the palaces to the public as attractions like france did. Leeches they are nowt more. Have to disagree with that. there is an added cache from having a real living royal family using these places and all of the bullsh..I mean ceremony that goes on around them. if you want to be small-minded and not see the bigger more lucrative picture that's up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrchang Posted November 16, 2014 Share Posted November 16, 2014 (edited) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_hUbhRl7c4 Edited November 16, 2014 by mrchang 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 I think its the very idea of sovereignty that's abhorrent,born to rule,a bloodline from god?fuck off 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwubba Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 well said @@Punk my man,also I am welsh she's not my fookin' queen and as for the prince of wales,the last prince of wales that was actually welsh was Owain Glyndwr about a thousand years ago.so fook off you cunts we don't want or need a monarchy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor Kruger Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I'm English and is my queen but she can still fuck off. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sterling-archer Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 (edited) Have to disagree with that. there is an added cache from having a real living royal family using these places and all of the bullsh..I mean ceremony that goes on around them. if you want to be small-minded and not see the bigger more lucrative picture that's up to you. Royal mail and the dodgy sale plus revenue from art work they sold,all the estate upkeep costs we the tax payer foot out for,her multi million barge/ new carriage etc recently and all the other things they charge us for in the Queens name when she does nowt and has no positive input at all... Who sees the bigger picture here,come on dude lol Sorry im mobile so my typing isnt perfect Edited November 18, 2014 by sterling-archer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weedshark Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Who sees the bigger picture here,come on dude lol just the tip. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embryo Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 just the tip.One of my favourite games 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now