Jump to content

You Gov Chat Asking Peoples Opinions Of Legalising / Weed Again


MidgeSmith

Recommended Posts

When the powers that be decide we can have a smoke, they will let us know, until then, no amount of names on lists are going ro change that, delusional, thats the only word i can find for people who hold any faith in petitioning the govenment, 

 

Just saying,

 

DJ...

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, *DJ* said:

When the powers that be decide we can have a smoke, they will let us know, until then, no amount of names on lists are going ro change that, delusional, thats the only word i can find for people who hold any faith in petitioning the govenment, 

 

Just saying,

 

DJ...


You mean like Hannah Deacon did with Alfie Dingle & Charlotte Caldwell with Billie when they got the Medical Cannabis law changed by getting enough press attention because of the number of people that signed the petition? Not delusional, though it takes a synergy, then it is functional.  Always hiding does fuck all, that's for sure.

It's not a main driver, I totally concede, but it can help to change the inertia and changing public opinion and policy depends on changing the herd attitude, reaching critical mass - in conjunction with corporate money getting behind the whole thing and the media being edged out.

We don't live in a democracy, we live in a populist dictatorship.  YouGov was set up to rinse corporations and to gauge public opinion to help to colour the marketing of policy.  I accept that the spirit of what you are saying, but neither can we ever rely on a UK government to legalise weed without pressure. They need evidence their spin is weakening.

Edited by MidgeSmith
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Degsy said:

Maybe I'm just too cynical at this point but 'corporate money' is not going to produce any law which is in my interest

 


No, possibly, but if the American firms get it legalised to make a quick buck eventually, it is harder for them to argue it is too dangerous for homegrowers to be allowed to grow it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What gets me is how they talk about 'legalising', This is incorrect, as the accurate term should be re-legalising. They didn't legalise party's after the lockdowns, they re-legalised them. They've had their party of prohibition now, it was about money and control and now  it's over. We're as per usual the country that does everything last. I just hope we don't end up with the level of commercialisation as in the US, though if I can be the custodian of a few plants in my garden without the worry of being kidnapped, locked up and punished every summer, then I'd take a bit of that.  

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2023 at 11:50 PM, MidgeSmith said:


No, possibly, but if the American firms get it legalised to make a quick buck eventually, it is harder for them to argue it is too dangerous for homegrowers to be allowed to grow it.

 

They will allow you to grow as many plants as your allotted carbon credits let you.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BJ Plant Trainer said:

 

They will allow you to grow as many plants as your allotted carbon credits let you.


Ain't that the fucking truth. Though growing outside, growing dozens you could earn your carbon credits for winter by fixing carbon for them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Clean Green said:

What gets me is how they talk about 'legalising', This is incorrect, as the accurate term should be re-legalising. They didn't legalise party's after the lockdowns, they re-legalised them. They've had their party of prohibition now, it was about money and control and now  it's over. We're as per usual the country that does everything last. I just hope we don't end up with the level of commercialisation as in the US, though if I can be the custodian of a few plants in my garden without the worry of being kidnapped, locked up and punished every summer, then I'd take a bit of that.  



You are so right, it's all spin, smoke, mirrors and bullshit.

 

Unfortunately though, the law as discussed in parliament is looking at hitting even simple low level possession a LOT harder.  They've got a whole lot of people fooled and the imbalance to the right is insane.  The Independent has recently added in new right wing leadership who are taking this formerly left wing paper lurching to the right.  I assume that was the plan all along.  Too many people are folloiwing the Tories (and Red Tory Starmer's) bullshit as read, in the face of evidence to the contrary from countries all around the world.

 

We really are in a 2 party system of fools.  That's why I am adamant about having a say, even through an alt email and VPN.

Edited by MidgeSmith
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2023 at 11:21 PM, MidgeSmith said:


You mean like Hannah Deacon did with Alfie Dingle & Charlotte Caldwell with Billie when they got the Medical Cannabis law changed by getting enough press attention because of the number of people that signed the petition? Not delusional, though it takes a synergy, then it is functional.  Always hiding does fuck all, that's for sure.

It's not a main driver, I totally concede, but it can help to change the inertia and changing public opinion and policy depends on changing the herd attitude, reaching critical mass - in conjunction with corporate money getting behind the whole thing and the media being edged out.

We don't live in a democracy, we live in a populist dictatorship.  YouGov was set up to rinse corporations and to gauge public opinion to help to colour the marketing of policy.  I accept that the spirit of what you are saying, but neither can we ever rely on a UK government to legalise weed without pressure. They need evidence their spin is weakening.

 

I mean, when the powers that be decide you can have a legal smoke, then you can smoke, until then, crack on as you were, its the best your going to get for a while, 

 

Just saying, again, 

 

DJ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, *DJ* said:

 

I mean, when the powers that be decide you can have a legal smoke, then you can smoke, until then, crack on as you were, its the best your going to get for a while, 

 

Just saying, again, 

 

DJ...


Well, that's just like, your opinion, man.

I respect that but mine differs. The quote included indicates why.

 

Of course they'll decide if, but they never change anything without pressure and money being applied.

Anyway, opinions are opinions and I have done my bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MidgeSmith said:


Well, that's just like, your opinion, man.

I respect that but mine differs. The quote included indicates why.

 

Of course they'll decide if, but they never change anything without pressure and money being applied.

Anyway, opinions are opinions and I have done my bit.

 

Withnailed,

 

 

DJ....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The police hardly even show up to armed robberies in shops these days. They don't have the resources to fuck with someone smoking a joint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/09/2023 at 7:47 PM, *DJ* said:

When the powers that be decide we can have a smoke, they will let us know, until then, no amount of names on lists are going ro change that, delusional, thats the only word i can find for people who hold any faith in petitioning the govenment, 

 

Just saying,

 

DJ...

Fucking waste of time fuck the government and there shitty petition . Really don’t care if it’s legal or illegal crack on regardless of there bloody laws.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use