Power of consciousness.

[BiPolar Dave]

This site is great. Explains "stuff" in biblical simplisity. It's more likely to put you in "contact" than any other reading material.

http://biologyofkundalini.com/article.php?story=Egodeath

Suggest reading the entire site if you want a understand my words a bit more, in another way.

Just engage your filters and use whats useful and ignore whats not.

[grooving]

As a side note Dave, dig deeper on Mother Theresa. She wasn't as perfect as you seem to believe. Christopher Hitchins did his best to expose the sham.

[Guest bazzad9]

As a side note Dave, dig deeper on Mother Theresa. She wasn't as perfect as you seem to believe. Christopher Hitchins did his best to expose the sham.

mother theresa was a bitch ,pure and simple

suffering was good for you according to her ,only she used the money she got to fly to europe for the best treatment available while telling others to suffer there illness as it was good for them

bitch

[BiPolar Dave]

As a side note Dave, dig deeper on Mother Theresa. She wasn't as perfect as you seem to believe. Christopher Hitchins did his best to expose the sham.

mother theresa was a bitch ,pure and simple

suffering was good for you according to her ,only she used the money she got to fly to europe for the best treatment available while telling others to suffer there illness as it was good for them

bitch

She was just used an example, I didn't think it out the article was smash typed of the top of my head for bit of fun.

According to my theory Hilter also used the power...anyone can but the not at the peak, so good, bad ugly it's all the same - all that exists is a singularity, so MT was a good as Hitler to the eyes of all that is, the eyes that are all that is, they don't judge in duality. Beyond duality is the final ticket to being truely free from judgement.

[nop]

...at the time of her death had 610 missions in 123 countries including hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis, soup kitchens, children's and family counselling programmes, orphanages and schools.

For over 45 years, she ministered to the poor, sick, orphaned, and dying, she was the recipient of numerous honours including the 1979 Nobel Peace Prize. She refused the conventional ceremonial banquet given to laureates, and asked that the $192,000 funds be given to the poor in India.

sounds like a right cunt...

Edited August 25, 2012 by nop

[Guest bazzad9]

"Towards the end of her life, Mother Teresa attracted some negative attention in the Western media. The journalist Christopher Hitchens was one of her most active critics. He was commissioned to co-write and narrate the documentary Hell's Angel about her for the British Channel 4 after Aroup Chatterjee encouraged the making of such a programme, although Chatterjee was unhappy with the "sensationalist approach" of the final product.[61] Hitchens expanded his criticism in a 1995 book, The Missionary Position.[79]

Chatterjee writes that while she was alive Mother Teresa and her official biographers refused to collaborate with his own investigations and that she failed to defend herself against critical coverage in the Western press. He gives as examples a report in The Guardian in Britain whose "stringent (and quite detailed) attack on conditions in her orphanages ... [include] charges of gross neglect and physical and emotional abuse",[80] and another documentary Mother Teresa: Time for Change? broadcast in several European countries.[61]

The German magazine Stern published a critical article on the first anniversary of Mother Teresa's death. This concerned allegations regarding financial matters and the spending of donations. The medical press has also published criticism of her, arising from very different outlooks and priorities on patients' needs.[71] Other critics include Tariq Ali of the New Left Review and the Irish investigative journalist Donal MacIntyre.[79]

She has also been criticized for her view on suffering. She felt that suffering would bring people closer to Jesus.[81] Sanal Edamaruku, President of Rationalist International, criticised the failure to give painkillers, writing that in her Homes for the Dying, one could "hear the screams of people having maggots tweezered from their open wounds without pain relief. On principle, strong painkillers were not administered even in severe cases. According to Mother Teresa's philosophy, it is 'the most beautiful gift for a person that he can participate in the sufferings of Christ'."[82]

The quality of care offered to terminally ill patients in the Homes for the Dying has been criticised in the medical press. The Lancet and the British Medical Journal reported the reuse of hypodermic needles, poor living conditions, including the use of cold baths for all patients, and an approach to illness and suffering that precluded the use of many elements of modern medical care, such as systematic diagnosis.[71] Dr. Robin Fox, editor of The Lancet, described the medical care as "haphazard", as volunteers without medical knowledge had to make decisions about patient care, because of the lack of doctors. He observed that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, so that people who could otherwise survive would be at risk of dying from infections and lack of treatment. Dr. Fox makes it a point to contrast the term "hospice", on the one hand, with what he calls "Mother Teresa's Care for the Dying" on the other hand; noting that, while hospice emphasizes minimizing suffering with professional medical care and attention to expressed needs and wishes of the patient, her approach does not.[83]"

she does indeed sound like a right cnut

edit from wiki

Edited August 25, 2012 by bazzad9

[nop]

The journalist pro-athiest Christopher Hitchens was one of her most active critics.

"Towards the end of her life, Mother Teresa attracted some negative attention

yeah towards the end of her lfe when she was ill ::, well contrary to popular belief she was no saint ..but the fact remains she helped way more people than you & a 100 of hitchins put together ..only well fed and sheltered westerners would bother picking over those bones

...at the time of her death had 610 missions in 123 countries including hospices and homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis, soup kitchens, children's and family counselling programmes, orphanages and schools.

For over 45 years, she ministered to the poor, sick, orphaned, and dying, she was the recipient of numerous honours including the 1979 Nobel Peace Prize. She refused the conventional ceremonial banquet given to laureates, and asked that the $192,000 funds be given to the poor in India.

Edited August 25, 2012 by nop

[Guest bazzad9]

fail to see why you needed to change journalist to pro athiest ?

seems irrelevant to me

you only commented on what he said as well no comments for the other investigations ?

or does using the "pro athiest" somehow invalidate the argument in some way?

yeah shunning pain killers and telling people that the suffering is bringing them closer to god was very helpfull im sure

and im sure not diognosing people properly and just guessing didnt lead to that many needless deaths

lovely lady

and im sure all those donations couldnt have been better spent on say ...a proper hospital ,with meds and doctors

but apart from that yes she did in her mind bring lots of people closer to god with there suffering ,that being the god that let them get ill in the first place of course ,if you beleive that stuff

[scraglor]

Agree/Disagree. Sadly this needs another long posting to justify my claims against a short sweeping generalisation from you, Strawberry.

You think your comment gives the subject the worth is deserves? I don't.

I think your statment is a short, sweeping and way way way too simplistic.

I'm not sure all the research of this subject is nonsense?

Read the article where they used electric to switch off the left lobe, they did this in a buddhist who claimed to have reached the highest of enlightenment at times in his journey. He described the right side only experience as the same as his spiritual experiences, the peak without the left side over-riding, it usually dominatess, meditation etc is just a "method" to connect to the right/moving beyond the confines of the left. EGO is all left.

somewhere on this site there is a video posted of a female neuroscientist who had a stroke on the left hand side of her brain and described the same thing. i.e. like a full on lsd/shroom trip

Edited August 25, 2012 by scraglor

[scraglor]

[scraglor]

It's concentration too, racing thoughts are all left side. When you go into the "zone", F1 driver etc becomes automatic, no thought = right side.

That's a right side connection the sportsman uses, spatial awareness is right side.

spatial awareness is most definitely left side hence the reason i dissolved into the sofa and then the cosmos during my last slightly over enthusiastic mushroom dose

[Guest grandad]

people like myself believe in nothing but the trickery and insanity of people, their are no super humans, we are all equal some just think they are more equal than others.

[rustledust]

I thought the hippocampus controled spatial awareness and we got one in each side of the brain.

[scraglor]

but you need your left hand side to put it into a useful context

[BiPolar Dave]

People get so caught up in trivia, trivial pursuits, nit picking details they often end up missing the grand image, wood for trees, this probably the worst offender in wasting all your energy.

Interesting video, was already "experienced" as Jimi would call it.

All men are born equal, more or less, that is sure, the downgrade starts just after you emerge, the level of that downgrade depends on all your experiences before the conscious kicks in? When you're just a video camera before you reach 5 or so. Nothing in, Nothing out.