Legalisation + Impairment Tests

[Hashmaker6]

Probably when you've been fucked once you'd have a tendancy to be a little reticent

This is more probable. They wouldn't get struck off, the Royal College for Medicine and Faculty of Public Health both support decriminalisation of all drugs

[Amaethon]

On 10/09/2016 at 1:21 PM, Edward said:

It's not about making the roads safer it's about raising extra cash when they want.

If only it were just about the revenue from fines.

Our political masters - with one eye on the daily mail - seek to punish and ostracise those who use the drugs that they don't.

The limits set for legal cannabis/saliva/blood levels have nothing to do with impairment - no tests have been carried out.

It's simply an alternative means of punishing and repressing people who are not them.

And unfortunately for us THC is detectable in the system for ages.

 

I think that the government will hold up legalisation until their chums in big pharma have synthesised, marketed and made mega bucks from what is basically a weed.

They'll probably try to patent it's DNA monsanto style.

So when you hear that it's going to be legalised, licenced, controlled, taxed, etc. the battle will not be over - it will just have entered a new phase.

That's the view of a cynic and a pessimist -but one who'd love to be proved wrong.

I'm vaping GG Northern Lights tonight - that's liberating

 

[gb1]

watch what they "try" here....  its going to be a right laugh... 

 

theyre going with 2 ng/ml and swabs being taken at any time. Up to two hours after you get home even they can come and knock on your door and swab away. 

hence the word "try" here....