Jump to content

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Impact Assessment


Something_witty

Recommended Posts

Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - Impact Assessment

Responsible department: Home Office

Drug related harms and the costs to society remain high in Britain, with a growing consensus that the current enforcement led approach is not working. In recent months the independent UK Drugs Policy Commission has highlighted the fact that Government is spending around £3 billion a year on a policy that is often self-defeating; and the Home Affairs Select Committee has concluded Government action is needed "now, more than ever" to consider all the alternatives to our failing drug laws and learn from countries that have adopted a more evidence based approach. We are concerned that, in this age of austerity, nobody is checking whether Britain's current approach is value for money - or money wasted. We therefore call on the Government to commission an authoritative and independent cost-benefit analysis and impact assessment of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 within the next 12 months, in order to provide the evidence for Parliament to pursue a more effective

Source,

epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/45969

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not seen it in the search so putting it up

Drug laws kill

celebs%2Frusselbrand%2FRussell-Brand.jpg Almost 2,000 young people die in the UK each year from taking illegal drugs. But leading police, doctors, and politicians agree prohibition has completely failed to curb addiction and instead costs the UK £3bn a year. So, it’s not just drugs that kill -- it’s our drug laws.

Right now, Nick Clegg says he wants reform (at the moment - so act quick before he changes his mind) and the anomalously trustworthy MP Caroline Lucas has started a campaign for a full review of UK drugs policy. But we only have days to get 100,000 of us to join her so the government will be forced to debate it in Parliament. It will take 90-100 seconds (depending on typing skills). Please sign this thing:

From here http://www.avaaz.org/en/uk_epetition/?bfzQHcb&v=35773

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it means that it will be considered for debate by the Backbench Business Committee. No firm promise of debate or anything, just that it will be considered for debate.

e2a so pretty much f all probably.

Edited by Mattyd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy Terms of Use