QUOTE(A-dam @ Apr 8 2006, 06:56 PM) [snapback]549996[/snapback]
We grew Ruderalis in Sweden a couple of summers ago. We vegged it at home and put them out together with Early Pearl and Early Skunk. Only the Ruderalis finnished in the end of september or beginning of october. Only two out of ten finnished, the rest got eaten we guess. It got 60 cm high and pretty fat. We were lucky to harvest the weekend we did, mould almost got a hold of the plant. We could easily take the bad parts away. The high was not bad at all but not so very nice taste thou.
About the autoflowering I read that not every plant will auto bloom. I don´t remeber if it got to be around 50-50 auto blooming or not.
If you have bought some ruderalis that havent autoflower, the genetics of the plant are unstable. Lowrider will always autoflower ;0. Il try to explain how ruderalis flowers.
Most types of Cannabis Sativa use photoperiodism to tell when its time to produce flowers. To understand more il try to sum up how they do this. Plants can sense the lenth of light they recive and of what spectrum and even at ehat ammount. It is not yet fully understood the full workings of a flowering plant, but amonst other things like (IIA) and this it thought to be mediated by phytochromes.
Phytochromes are two identical protein molecules each conjugated to a light-absorbing molecule. What is intresting about these protiens is how the chemical structure of phytochrome is altered to its complementary form when struck by photons of the correct energy level or light.
This is really complex stuff so lets stoner frendly this info
Basicly the phytochrome molecule is the photoreceptor for red light responses. It exists in two forms, Pr and Pfr. Pr is a blue form that absorbs red light and Pfr is a blue-green form that absorbs far-red light. When these protiens are activated they cause changes in the plants mRNA
thought to be controlled by horemones and causes the plant to produce flowers, Ruderalis works in a diffrent way. In the horticultural world they call these plants Day neutral plants or (DNP) for short.
This is REALLY HARD INFO SO IL EXPLAIN THE BEST I CAN. but Im no expert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Before I begin, Im going to post a extracted piece of info from another website:
The Flowering Hormone or Florigen (taken from Botany online)No other botanical substance has so long and so unsuccessfully been searched for as for the flowering hormone or florigen. It did at least became a name, and its existence could be proven by grafting experiments. Phytochrome that is localized within the leaves is required for the control of flower formation. The conditioning, i.e. the signal necessary for stimulation of flowering or for suppression of flower formation is also generated within the leaves. The majority of the classic grafting experiments was performed with Nicotiana-species. Nicotiana sylvestris is a long-day plant and Nicotiana tabacum, var. Maryland Mammoth (M.M.) is a short-day plant. Most other Nicotiana tabacum-species are day-neutral.
If Nicotiana sylvestris, for example, is cultivated under short-day conditions, does it not develop flowers, but if a leaf of a Nicotiana tabacum, M.M. plant that was cultivated under short-day conditions is grafted to Nicotiana sylvestris, then it is stimulated to flower. This means that the Nicotiana tabacum, M.M.-leaf had produced a substance that was transferred to the recipient after grafting and that caused its flower formation. This proved the existence of a florigen. The opposite experiment works, too: a Nicotiana tabacum, M.M.-recipient flowers under long-day conditions under the influence of a Nicotiana sylvestris graft. Similar results are received when grafting Nicotiana sylvestris, M.M. and a species of the genus Hyoscyamus (a long-day plant). Experiments with other species from several genera yielded comparable results. All results can be combined in consistent scheme.
In summary can the following conclusions be drawn (A. LANG, MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, East Lansing, 1984):
In the leaves of plants is a hormone-like substance (florigen) produced, maybe also a complex of substances, that is conducted to the shoot meristems in order to stimulate them to pass from vegetative growth to flower formation.
The florigen is not species-specific. It can be transferred to members of the same species, to members of one genus and to members of different genera. The transferability seems to be limited only by the acceptability of the graft. A good connection between the phloem of the two partners seems to be important. Grafting of monocots are very difficult to do and a florigen transfer by grafting has not been successful, but it could be shown with other techniques that it is required in monocots, too.
Florigen is physiologically not specific. It can without difficulty be exchanged between short-day, long-day and day-neutral plants. It is very likely that it is identical in all plants. The main difference between short-day and long-day plants is that the florigen production occurs only under a certain (inductive) light program, that differs in the two types.
It seems that a likewise transferable substance exists in several long-day plants that is produced under short-day conditions and suppresses flower formation. It is called antiflorigen. The reaction is weak and cannot be detected in all combinations. Florigen and antiflorigen appear to be antagonists. The flower formation is mainly based on the ratio of the two substances.
How can the combined action of florigen and phytochrome be explained? A. LANG illustrated it by the analogy of a circuit with alternative parallel connection. Accordingly has the ‘phytochrome switch’ of a long-day plant that is developing flowers to be on PFR, that of a short-day plant under the same condition on PR. In this simple way can the scheme explain the production or non-production of florigen. Both connections would have to be functional in day-neutral plants.
Now too stoner this aswell:
Basicly We dont now shit about flowering plants

. But we like to guess

And as the years go on we are finding out that more and more of the plants flowering cycles have to do with the genetics of the plant. My theory is that Ruderalis is producing flowering horemones as soon as it germinates. If anyone else knows more I am very intrested in this subject, and how it effects a plants DNA when reverting plants back to grow. Most growers sais they notice no apparent changes in plants that have been reverted, but there are some very weird changes going on inside the plant in flowering thought to be linked to swiches in genes controlled by horemones. And it is now being said that once swiched over the plant will always be into this so called "flower mode". Post your thoughts please !!!!
If you still awake after reading this, hope this has helped out abit.