Background in brief is that I unwillingly went on one of the "big 4" Disease Modifying MS treatments (basically major immunosuppressants, supposed to cut relapse rate) in June 2003. After a year of self injecting and nasty side-effects the only noticeable result of the treatment was that my relapse rate had actually increased, and I had sunken patches at my injection sites where the fat cells had been killed off
Fast-forward to a couple of weeks ago, when I was called in for a brain/spinal MRI. After I'd had it I asked why they had wanted one (they don't usually do them other than for diagnostic purposes because they are so expensive for the NHS) and was told "if it shows a lot more damage has occured since the last one then the neuro will want you to go back on DM treatment"
I said that I'd just wait and see what the results were as they might be better than expected (thinking that would be a good argument that I didn't need DM treatment) but was then told "yes but if they are better than expected the neuro may feel that's because you were on treatment for a year and so you should go back on it"
FFS! I feel like I'm being set up here ("That's some catch, that catch 22") and I can see a bit of a war of wills on the horizon about the issue as I really don't want to go back on DM treatment, especially given what I've since read about how unwise it is to suppress the immune system long-term in this way.
I don't mind going against medical advice particularly as I feel that it's up to me what I do or don't put in my body, but what I am worried about is that I have a Disability Living Allowance check coming up this year, and they get a report from my neuro as part of that. So could they possibly argue that I am making myself worse by refusing treatment and take my DLA off me for that reason?
msmj