I've just been taking a little time to look at the software known as Truecrypt in a little bit more depth.
I was just reading an article which makes for some uncomfortable reading.
In short, the article states that
QUOTE
"No one knows who wrote TrueCrypt.
No one knows who maintains TC.
Moderators on the TC forum ban users who ask questions. They also claim to be open source, but do not maintain public CVS/SVN repositories and do not issue change logs. They ban folks from the forums who ask for change logs or old source code. They also silently change binaries (md5 hashes change) with no explanation… zero. The Trademark is held by a man in the Czech Republic ((REGISTRANT) Tesarik, David INDIVIDUAL CZECH REPUBLIC Taussigova 1170/5 Praha CZECH REPUBLIC 18200.) Domains are registered private by proxy. Some folks claim it has a backdoor. Who Knows?"
No one knows who maintains TC.
Moderators on the TC forum ban users who ask questions. They also claim to be open source, but do not maintain public CVS/SVN repositories and do not issue change logs. They ban folks from the forums who ask for change logs or old source code. They also silently change binaries (md5 hashes change) with no explanation… zero. The Trademark is held by a man in the Czech Republic ((REGISTRANT) Tesarik, David INDIVIDUAL CZECH REPUBLIC Taussigova 1170/5 Praha CZECH REPUBLIC 18200.) Domains are registered private by proxy. Some folks claim it has a backdoor. Who Knows?"
I have used it myself previously, but I have become a bit more wary of it, with the discovery that there is software available which can detect the existence of truecrypt partitions.
It operates on the basis of identifying them using 4 criteria ;
1. No File Header.
2. (File size / 512) = 1
3. Successful X2 and Arithmetic Mean tests on certain bytes.
4. File size greater than 15 MB.
Anyone have any thoughts on either the integrity of the (presumed unknown) authors, or of the integrity of the executable binaries which are made available?
