QUOTE (scraglor @ Jan 18 2009, 07:51 PM)

1 square metre is around 9 square feet, a 1000 watter in a square meter is nearly 100watts per square foot.
93w per sq ft, to be exact. Equivalent to about 85w per sq ft from a 600w, in terms of lux.
QUOTE
NO WAY are you gonna hit a g/watt with 100w per square foot.
Who mentioned a gram per watt, besides yourself? If everything was perfect (CO2, TAG/biobucket/vertical, climate control), then 0.9gpw would be just about doable, if using the equivalent of 85w per sq ft. I'd say that 0.75gpw is more realistic. The vertical systems make better use of the higher w per sq ft.
QUOTE
over 80 watts per foot and any additional light goes unused
Not quite. The efficiency just drops off significantly. I've seen a few diaries using 1000w per sq meter that yielded suprisingly high in terms of gpw. When the system is designed very well, with the addition of CO2, the plants can make use of the extra light efficiently.
QUOTE
600g/meter is more of a realistic aim, and that's for an experienced grower. as the aim is to get 900g/meter without any mention of co2 i'd hazard a guess at not being all that experienced
I too suspect that he's inexperienced, although one shouldn't presume that he didn't have the use of CO2 in mind just because he didn't mention it. An experienced grower aiming for such high figures would have mentioned that they knew that an unconventionally high wattage would be required, aswel as CO2. With this in mind, we have rightfully suggested that he set his sights considerably lower. You mentioned 600g/meter and I mentioned a max of 0.75g per watt, which both seem reasonable in the circumstances.
Gunna