QUOTE (Mintball @ Nov 29 2008, 02:11 PM)

I agree with everything you say, especially the last paragraph. What I cant get my head round, is why put someone at age 18 on Methadone, when they have never taken heroin.
I suspect that methadone was prescribed with the main concern being its comparatively low cost: less than half the cost of similarly-effective pharmaceuticals. If this is the case, then I have a serious problem with this kind of cost-cutting. Methadone is far-and-away a worse drug than heroin, in terms of toxicity and especially in terms of withdrawal. According to accounts from both heroin and methadone addicts, cold turkey isn't pleasant by any stretch, but methadone withdrawal is
hell on earth. So I am very suspicious of a specialist who uses methadone as a primary pain intervention – can I ask what other analgesia was tried before methadone was prescribed? In any case, I have an intrinsic problem with the prescription of methadone to heroin addicts, when diamorphine (clinical heroin) is an significantly safer drug, albeit more expensive. A diamorphine management regime is gentler and safer, and fulfils more ‘harm-reduction’ criteria than methadone. Based on the slim evidence before me, I’d tentatively conclude that prescribing methadone to an 18 year old with no prior use of heroin, is medical GBH. However I’m not a doctor, so maybe there are solid reasons I haven't the experience or knowledge to consider.
QUOTE
Surely it is going to do more damage to my body long term than weed.
Yes, that is certain. Methadone has a very long list of side-effects and health-risks, including the risk of overdose. In terms of direct lethality, about 100 people die of methadone every year in the UK; compared to exactly zero from cannabis.
QUOTE
But weed is smoked, therefore bad for my health. thats the main reason I want the spray, plus so I can use it during the day.
The jury is out on exactly what risks smoked weed occasions. Some reports point to lung cancer as a potential danger, other studies indicate the
in vitro reduction of tumours which would imply an anti-carcinogenic effect. If there are such risks - and you're sensible to assume there are until otherwise demonstrated - vaporised cannabis would be much better for you, eating it even more so, and sativex spray excellent in terms of harm-reduction.
But with regard to soapbar, don’t be too sure that what you are smoking is even cannabis; soapbar is notorious for containing a litany of other unknown adulterants, and some has even been reported to contain no cannabis at all. Many at UK420 would urge you to avoid it altogether, since it is impossible to say what might be in the stuff.
Here’s hoping you get some joy from your healthcare providers…
Ed