Jump to content


15% off Plant Magic
Photo
- - - - -

Marijuana Supporters Need To Vote With Their Dollars


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 lovin' Mary

lovin' Mary

    I found the Pot at the end of the rainbow then smoked it

  • Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3621 posts

Posted 15 March 2012 - 06:31 PM

Posted by Johnny Green at 9:31 AM on March 15, 2012 Ending Marijuana Prohibition, Medical Marijuana Policy Add comments.


The Marijuana Movement Needs To Boycott Companies That Support Prohibition

You may have heard something about a boycott against Starbucks that was led by marijuana activists. For those of you that haven’t, here is the breakdown; The organization ‘Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation’ called for a nationwide boycott of Starbucks after the coffee company appeared on the “sponsor” page of the Colorado Drug Investigators Association (CDIA). The CDIA is a group of law enforcement officials lobbying to end the state’s voter-approved medical marijuana system and revert back to the old laws.

After word of the boycott spread on the internet, thousands of marijuana supporters contacted Starbucks’ management to inform them that they would be getting their coffee fix somewhere else. In record time, Starbucks issued a formal statement assuring the public that it does not support the anti-marijuana group. Another company that was listed as a sponsor of the CDIA was ‘The North Face,’ a clothing line that is extremely popular with snowboarders and hikers.

Once customer complaints flooded in, the clothing company issued a public statement denying they were ever a sponsor of the CDIA. Instead of issuing their own public statement about the obvious lies they were telling, the CDIA shut down its website. Another company listed as a sponsor was Enterprise-Rent-A-Car. However, it seemed that the car company dodged the boycott bullet before the CDIA site was taken down.

This isn’t the first time in recent history that marijuana supporters have united to boycott a company. About a year ago the infamous ‘bong hit seen around the world’ debuted on the internet, which was a photo of Olympian gold medalist Michael Phelps hitting a bong. In reaction, Kellogg’s cereal company dropped their sponsorship agreement with Phelps. Almost instantly, websites and stoner publications called for a boycott against Kellogg’s.

Kellogg’s stock dropped almost 10 dollars in the first month of the boycott. Of course, it is hard to determine to what extent the boycott had on this price drop, but considering that cereal is the ‘stoner’s cup of tea,’ one can assume there was at least a partial correlation. I know I switched cereal brands, and when I am high (which is everyday), I eat A LOT of cereal.

YouTube was scrutinized by the marijuana community for censoring legalization questions from President Obama’s question and answer sessions, TWO TIMES. Also, Chase Bank got heat from the marijuana community for denying a student-based marijuana organization a grant that it legitimately won in an on-line competition. Whether or not these will develop into more successful boycotts is yet to be seen; only time will tell. Should boycotts be a weapon in the war for marijuana legalization more often?

In a capitalist system, people vote with their dollars. The more dollars you have, the more votes you get to cast. Since time immemorial, marijuana consumers have voted for 20 sacks and quarter ounces in record numbers. After the marijuana is consumed, they still have extra cash to ‘vote’ for clothes, food, and entertainment. Considering the fact there are more and more marijuana consumers every day, businesses need to be more sympathetic to the marijuana cause.

Back in the day, businesses would distance themselves from marijuana consumers in order to gain customers; now more businesses make sure to stay neutral on the issue of marijuana legalization in order to keep customers. In the future, will we see major companies pour money into pro-marijuana activities in order to gain customers? I know I would support one company over another if one was pro-marijuana and the other was just ‘neutral.’ What about you??
http://www.theweedbl...-their-dollars/

:yinyang:

Auto's love airpots

http://www.uk420.com...c=315454&page=1

 

Smoke em, smoke em, smoke em if you got em if you ain't got em you hit rock bottom


#2 tengreenfingers

tengreenfingers

    Resin Coated

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4317 posts

Posted 16 March 2012 - 03:00 AM

Do we have a central location where we can see/share which companies are supporting prohibition (or conversely, opposing it) in order to make the choice of which ones to vote for or against with our money?
"99% of police make the rest look bad." - Jacob Appelbaum

#3 namkha

namkha

    Resin Coated

  • Lifetime Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5542 posts

Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:21 PM

Do we have a central location where we can see/share which companies are supporting prohibition (or conversely, opposing it) in order to make the choice of which ones to vote for or against with our money?


let me know if you find one

I won't be going to Starbucks ever again

their coffee tastes of f all anyway
www.therealseedcompany.com

"Look, we understood we couldn't make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue...that we couldn't resist it." - John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon on the rationale of the War on Drugs.

"[Nixon] emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks" Haldeman, his Chief of Staff wrote, "The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to."

#4 hairy face

hairy face

    Resin Coated

  • Lifetime Subscriber
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3421 posts

Posted 16 March 2012 - 12:53 PM

This isn’t the first time in recent history that marijuana supporters have united to boycott a company. About a year ago the infamous ‘bong hit seen around the world’ debuted on the internet, which was a photo of Olympian gold medalist Michael Phelps hitting a bong. In reaction, Kellogg’s cereal company dropped their sponsorship agreement with Phelps. Almost instantly, websites and stoner publications called for a boycott against Kellogg’s.

When Kellogs stopped sponsoring Phelps over a bong hit, I stopped sponsoring Kellogs. I'm still stopped.

If I drank Startbuck's shite I'd stop that too.

"Faith, by definition, is believing in something without evidence, and personally I don't do that because I'm not an idiot". Kate Smurthwaite



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users