CLEAR - Cannabis Law Reform Party Is Peter Reynolds the right Leader?
Posted 13 January 2012 - 01:27 PM
Derek if you want to comment on this latest development please feel free to post here mate
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:23 PM
CLEAR Equal Opportunities Statement
We believe it is essential to CLEAR’s principles, productivity, and efficacy to enable activists of all backgrounds to reach their full potential by encouraging an environment that is inclusive to all.
To this end, and within the framework and spirit of the law, we are committed to achieving and maintaining a support and activist base which broadly reflects the community at large.
CLEAR whole-heartedly supports the principle of equal opportunities and opposes all forms of unlawful or unfair discrimination on the grounds of colour, race, nationality, ethnic or national origin, sex, disability, age, religious belief, sexual orientation or marital status.
We welcome people who support cannabis law reform from whatever cultural, ethnic or political backgrounds, be they cannabis users or not.
We believe that it is in CLEAR's best interests and of all those who work as part of it, to attract, retain and develop a diverse pool of activists and supporters.
Every possible step will be taken to ensure that individuals are treated equally and fairly, and a mechanism will be introduced for people to raise concerns and seek action if they feel an infringement has been made. Members found to be in violation of the CLEAR equal opportunities policy will be dealt with in accordance with a defined disciplinary procedure.*
The formal Disputes procedure is being drafted and will be presented shortly.
As always we welcome comments, now is a good time to have your say.
* Unless you happen to be the leader of the party.
This post has been edited by Puff Adder: 13 January 2012 - 06:26 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:34 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:40 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 08:47 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:21 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:24 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:31 PM
This post has been edited by Eddiesilence: 13 January 2012 - 09:33 PM
Posted 13 January 2012 - 09:49 PM
...Leave behind the disgusting and corrupt Karzai for, sure enough, whatever we do, he is doomed to suffer a grisly and horrific fate
What, not only grisly but also horrific. Doomed also. Fuck. What are we talking here, buggered with a bayonet, not only horrific but also grisly? And doomed? Fuck.
Posted 13 January 2012 - 10:20 PM
That doesn't read too awkwardly does it? How about: 'he will suffer a grisly doomy horror fate'? Or, 'Suffer, he will, a horrific, and doomy, fate of grisliness'?
This post has been edited by Eddiesilence: 13 January 2012 - 10:43 PM