CLEAR - Cannabis Law Reform Party Is Peter Reynolds the right Leader?
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:38 PM
The information and articles contained in this post are all from the blog of Peter Reynolds, some people say that his views and behaviour are too extreme for a UK political party, some claim that Peter's views on religion, homosexuality and race issues will deter supporters from minority groups in joining a cannabis movement
People who support Peter say that his views aren't important and that it is the party and the cause that people should concentrate on, so here are Peter's own words and in the interest of fairness I have posted his response to the criticism of his views first
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:45 PM
Hmmm, isn't that ironic . Hippo crate !
Good to see ya knocking about Danzig .. Peter Reynolds ? Banned , defo.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:46 PM
Despite claiming that data is held on 'safe encrypted servers' in compliance with the Data Protection Act this is not the case and the ICO have confirmed that CLEAR UK are not registered as required under the act.
Registration is a legal requirement as is a nominated person who holds the post of Data Controller, a Data Control Policy that is compatible with the legal requirements laid down in the act is also required by law
The practise of allowing anonymous members to vote in party matters including leadership elections is open to abuse
This post has been edited by DANZIG: 11 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:50 PM
My bolt hole Grow a pair and you could be Jesus
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
Many Thanks .
(good to see you back onboard btw)
e2say : sorted now . Thanks
This post has been edited by ramblingmadman: 11 January 2012 - 04:54 PM
"To see the priority of love and well-being breaking down silly barriers put up by foolish men."
Cognitive liberty for all
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:52 PM
What happens if he got live air time and the interviewer started asking him questions on those subjects? cant block or delete during a live questioning sorry Peter
Posted 11 January 2012 - 04:57 PM
I wonder if the CLEAR executive have even thought of this?, if they did AND still believe PR is the man for the job then even if they manage positive steps forward to get to the point stated in the above quote they will be torn to shreds.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:23 PM
Posted 11 January 2012 - 05:27 PM
- A woolly jumper?
- No. It was horrible. We had to kill it with a shovel.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:10 PM
The after the fact pretence that the statements he made were deliberately provocative rings very hollow,
the fact he has removed the entire blog they were contained in speaks volumes.
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:18 PM
where as some of them are blatant and very telling of the kind of man he is.
there is definitely some rabble rousing going on here. and a personal grudge of sorts that im not a part of, nor do i want to be. but there is also the fact that those are his words and some of them are inexcusable and what he is suggesting realy offends me and a lot of people i care about.
as the leader of the only real voice in the uk speaking up for cannabis he may have lost some of my confidence with at least one or two of those examples above.
thanks for the heads up
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:19 PM
I'm pretty sure the only thing PR and myself have in common is cannabis and that doesn't mean I can ignore his views on everything else and tell myself they don't really matter