"Cannabis has in effect been decriminalised in Britain" The Economist
#1
Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:51 AM
Quietly, cannabis has in effect been decriminalised in Britain
http://www.economist..._medium=twitter
CANNABOOST plant food is one of the best selling products at the Hydroexpress hydroponics store in Stirchley, a working-class part of Birmingham. The small shop, its windows filled with graffiti-style posters, also sells fertilisers with names like “Nirvana” and “Bud Candy”, alongside strong lights and giant rolls of tin foil to line greenhouses. In one corner, a couple of juicy-looking tomato plants grow in a demonstration set-up. But the youth behind the counter guesses that his customers are “not all growing tomatoes”.
Birmingham now has 58 hydroponics shops, up from 42 just a year ago. Whether aided by the latest plant-growing technology or not, cannabis production is soaring. According to the Association of Chief Police Officers, the number of cannabis factories detected each year increased from around 800 in 2004 to 7,000 in 2010. Birmingham is one of the most fertile areas; West Midlands Police, which set up a Cannabis Disposal Unit in 2010 to tackle the problem, dismantled more than 500 factories last year.
Your correspondent visited one recently closed by police; the gardener was a cocaine-addicted woman growing a few plants in a spare room in the hope of earning a cut. Other set-ups have been found in tents in the bedrooms of high-rise council flats and in the lofts of terraced family houses. Many growers are simply feeding their own habits. As one officer on the West Midlands Police drugs team says, “It’s becoming the most popular cottage industry in the country.”
Small growers are squeezing out both importers and the well-connected, often Vietnamese, gangs that once dominated domestic production. The big cannabis factories set up by the latter, with their telltale heat hazes, are fairly easy to spot. Smaller operations are often uncovered only when the electric lights start fires, or when local teenagers mount a burglary.
The police and the courts can neither keep up with the surge in small-scale production, nor are they desperately keen to do so. Last month the government published new sentencing guidelines that advised judges to treat small cultivators less strictly. Attitudes to smokers are softening, too. The reclassification of cannabis in 2009, from class C to the more stringent class B, was oddly accompanied by a more liberal approach to policing consumption. Users caught on the street are rarely arrested; rather, they are issued “cannabis cautions” (a reprimand which doesn’t appear on a criminal record) or fined.
In Brixton, a south London neighbourhood, an open-air cannabis market exists within ten minutes’ walk of the underground station. The dealers are frequently moved on but they soon regroup elsewhere. As one dealer admits, his competitors are a bigger hassle than the police. “They get to fightin’, over money and things,” he says in a deep Caribbean drawl. Violence is far more likely to get a dealer into legal trouble than business.
Strangely, this lackadaisical approach is not encouraging people to take up the reefer habit. According to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, the proportion of people who admit to having used cannabis in Britain has fallen more quickly than in any other European country over the past few years. Just 6.8% of adults told another survey that they used cannabis in 2010, down from 10.9% eight years earlier. The herb is now ubiquitous and effectively tolerated—and, perhaps as a result, not all that alluring.
"Look, we understood we couldn't make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue...that we couldn't resist it." - John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon on the rationale of the War on Drugs.
"[Nixon] emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks" Haldeman, his Chief of Staff wrote, "The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to."
#2
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:02 PM
namkha, on 23 March 2012 - 11:51 AM, said:
Told ya so....
CannabisCorps - Meditate, Recreate, Medicate - but above all else, Educate.
Formally known as Titch.
#3
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:03 PM
Keep it up lads
OVERGROW THE U.K.
"I wanted to change the world. But i have found that the only thing one can be sure of changing is oneself"
( Aldous Huxley )
"Because of the progress mankind has achieved and because of the difficulties that are at times part and parcel of progress and prosperity, we find ourselves at a crossroads where we might make the world safe for our future generations or we might all perish together" ( Haile Selassie I )
#4
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:09 PM
chronic1, on 23 March 2012 - 12:03 PM, said:
Keep it up lads
OVERGROW THE U.K.
Amen!
"Look, we understood we couldn't make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue...that we couldn't resist it." - John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon on the rationale of the War on Drugs.
"[Nixon] emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks" Haldeman, his Chief of Staff wrote, "The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to."
#5
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:15 PM
Almost tempted to start a grow of my own now
This is an imaginary persona and cannot be connected in anyway to a real identity - I don't exist.
#6
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:18 PM
That report is contradictory to what other reporters say . Infact that same reporter might work for some other rag in the future and tell us something stupid like ,'' police are working zealously to end drug plants and say they're adamant to nip cultivation in the bud .''The laws are more lenient than in some other EU countries .
''effectively tolerated '' , my arse it is .If that were the case distraught members of uk420 from time to time wouldn't be in the Legal section looking for advice and new hinges for their front door.
This post has been edited by SilC: 23 March 2012 - 12:19 PM
#7
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:19 PM
OVERGROW PROHIBITION.
And be a real Activist! Clear enough?
#8
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:23 PM
The lethal dose ratio (LD-50) for cannabis is estimated to be around 1:20,000 to 1:40,000 which means you have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 times as much cannabis as is contained in one cannabis joint to induce death. This means you would have to consume something like 1,500 lbs in 15 minutes to induce a lethal response. There are no known fatalities from the substance and it is considered non- toxic...
...''First they ignore you; then they mock you; then they punish you; then you win."
Mahatma Ghandi
#9
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:28 PM
Arnold Layne, on 23 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
OVERGROW PROHIBITION.
And be a real Activist! Clear enough?
A-men, Brother!
wanking on about stuff on here with endless discussions - much as I love it - is not what makes the difference
Arnold, Cambium and many others have said it a thousands times before:
if you are serious about change, inform yourselves of the risks (and there are still plenty), and get growing!
the real way to bring down prohibition is to overload the system
grow cannabis, plant it everywhere -- (we need this stuff to be coming out of our ears - boycott cotton buds, plant the sacred herb in your lugholes!)
(facebook isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I give away free seeds on there the whole time if you want them)
This post has been edited by namkha: 23 March 2012 - 12:31 PM
"Look, we understood we couldn't make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue...that we couldn't resist it." - John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon on the rationale of the War on Drugs.
"[Nixon] emphasized that you have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks" Haldeman, his Chief of Staff wrote, "The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to."
#10
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:40 PM
Arnold Layne, on 23 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
OVERGROW PROHIBITION.
And be a real Activist! Clear enough?
namkha, on 23 March 2012 - 12:28 PM, said:
Arnold Layne, on 23 March 2012 - 12:19 PM, said:
OVERGROW PROHIBITION.
And be a real Activist! Clear enough?
A-men, Brother!
wanking on about stuff on here with endless discussions - much as I love it - is not what makes the difference
Arnold, Cambium and many others have said it a thousands times before:
if you are serious about change, inform yourselves of the risks (and there are still plenty), and get growing!
the real way to bring down prohibition is to overload the system
grow cannabis, plant it everywhere -- (we need this stuff to be coming out of our ears - boycott cotton buds, plant the sacred herb in your lugholes!)
(facebook isn't everybody's cup of tea, but I give away free seeds on there the whole time if you want them)
of course you are both correct..
but..
when peter shithead effectively said the same thing (about the decrim) a couple of months ago he was thrown to the wall about it
whats changed.?
This post has been edited by twigs: 23 March 2012 - 12:41 PM
The lethal dose ratio (LD-50) for cannabis is estimated to be around 1:20,000 to 1:40,000 which means you have to consume 20,000 to 40,000 times as much cannabis as is contained in one cannabis joint to induce death. This means you would have to consume something like 1,500 lbs in 15 minutes to induce a lethal response. There are no known fatalities from the substance and it is considered non- toxic...
...''First they ignore you; then they mock you; then they punish you; then you win."
Mahatma Ghandi
#11
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:40 PM
Irresponsible gits at The Economist while Winston's in for 16 months.
#12
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:40 PM
- noun 1. the use of hit-and-run tactics by small, mobile groups of irregular forces operating in territory controlled by a hostile, regular force.
Guerrilla Grow Diary Comp 2013
THREE
TWO | ONE
#13
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:45 PM
#14
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:47 PM
SilC, on 23 March 2012 - 12:18 PM, said:
That report is contradictory to what other reporters say . Infact that same reporter might work for some other rag in the future and tell us something stupid like ,'' police are working zealously to end drug plants and say they're adamant to nip cultivation in the bud .''The laws are more lenient than in some other EU countries .
''effectively tolerated '' , my arse it is .If that were the case distraught members of uk420 from time to time wouldn't be in the Legal section looking for advice and new hinges for their front door.
Tio be fair the Economist isnt really a rag. It is usually fairly objective.
edit: Although this isnt true. Cannabis has not been decriminalised in any form.
This post has been edited by rorymullan: 23 March 2012 - 12:48 PM
#15
Posted 23 March 2012 - 12:50 PM
Refined
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known - Carl Sagan

Help

















