Welcome to UK420

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more!

This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Luxembourg's cannabis legalisation is EU opportunity



Luxembourg's cannabis legalisation is EU opportunity




The announcement that Luxembourg would legalise and regulate cannabis for recreational purposes attracted much media attention this summer.

Similar to the outcome of similar discussions that took place in Canada, Uruguay, and many US states, Luxembourg authorities reached the conclusion that the prohibition of cannabis had failed to achieve any of its objectives, namely the elimination of the use, cultivation and trafficking in cannabis.

In fact, the substance is more available, more potent and more consumed than ever.


This is groundbreaking news, as Luxembourg will be the first European country to legally regulate the production, sale and consumption of cannabis (the Netherlands has a policy of de facto regulation of sale and consumption only), with all the implications this holds.

More importantly perhaps, if there is an EU country that can shift from prohibition to legal regulation and succeed, it is Luxembourg, where there are strong institutions, informed and empowered citizens, and trust between the people and their representatives.


Of course, this raises challenges for the EU and its three million cannabis consumers.


The decision to restrict sales to Luxembourg adult residents responds clearly to any issues related to border control and will minimise, if not prevent, cannabis tourism.

However, there will also be a need to manage the impact on the illegal trade in terms of product quality, trade routes and displacement due to a balloon effect: as the illegal market is pushed out of Luxembourg, it will most certainly shift to neighbouring countries just as the air compressed in a balloon at one end appears at the other.

Social and health issues may also become more severe in border regions, with higher rates of use and increased trafficking. This could require a different approach to transnational law-enforcement cooperation.


But the real question remains: are these issues for Luxembourg only, which is simply changing a failed policy of prohibition, or are they not also issues for its neighbouring countries, which refuse the evidence of the failure of their repressive policies and prefer to maintain their position in order to appear tough on crime?

The reality is that Luxembourg is embracing a policy that responds to the needs of its citizens who consume cannabis.


What about neighbours?

The onus is now on neighbouring governments to provide the same legal protective environment to their citizens who produce or use cannabis, or to continue to prohibit it and be forced to manage, regardless of the astronomical costs for their economies and youth, the unintended negative consequences of prohibition.

Many people (if not most) see this move as 'liberalising' or 'softening' the response to drugs, and to cannabis more specifically.

Yet, legally-regulating drugs transcends partisan politics, in the same way prohibition does.


A conservative view should support regulation as stripping the criminal justice system of its role in imposing straitjacket prohibition on citizens and developing a legal model of sale and consumption that respects individual rights and civil liberties.


It would also consider a minimal regulatory role by the state and a maximal accountability of clients if they hurt others with their use.

A left-wing reading of regulation is based on a big role for government, which aims to provide equal access to health, social and justice services for citizens; and establishes a general framework of access to the substance under strict control. This approach would be systemic, with the state regulating every aspect from production to sale, including consumption.

The discussion here should be therefore on government removing the market from organised crime and its key role in regulating all aspects of the sale and distribution of cannabis, including product quality, quantity limitations, points of sale and eligible consumers and clients.


Authorities in Luxembourg appear cognizant of these challenges and not just looking at the economic and social opportunities.

They seem to be approaching the design of a legal framework as they might any risky product or behaviour, based on best practice examples from Canada, Portugal and the Netherlands and learning about their successes and mistakes.


They are examining carefully how to address issues of age limits, what to do with underage consumption, whether or not to allow use in public spaces, and how to regulate production.

Finally, authorities are encouraging an open debate, inviting input from all parties concerned, from researchers and consumers to parents and health practitioners.


The new Luxembourg cannabis policy, when implemented, must be assessed in a multidisciplinary manner and allow for its parameters to be reviewed and correct course as needed.

Thus, the country will provide other European countries, and beyond, with one of the most solid, well built and scientifically evaluated regulatory framework of legal cannabis for recreational purposes and for adults.






1 person likes this

Share this post

Link to post

Indeed I have a good belief Luxembourg too that lux is the best country to set the European legalization ball rolling, doubt anywhere else will do it as good but time will tell.  The government over there understand simple logic and way beyond unlike our set of completely corrupt corpmated minded only jokers..  Wish I still lived there in lux, the people were alll so nice and chilled 

Edited by buttheaduk
2 people like this

Share this post

Link to post



Wee Add On...


Luxembourg’s cannabis stance may set EU precedent



ast month the tiny landlocked country Luxembourg announced it would be the first EU country to potentially legalise cannabis in the near future.

It was a bold statement by the country with a population of just 590,000, but it demonstrates that the warming of opinions on cannabis is not restricted to North America.


The local government reached the consensus that cannabis prohibition has so far failed to achieve its objectives, particularly on the topics of cultivation, trafficking and use among the citizens.


Etienne Schneider, Luxembourg’s health minister, revealed that “this drug policy we had over the last 50 years did not work”.

As a result, they plan to legally regulate the production of cannabis while also legalising consumption.


If this budding plan comes into fruition, Luxembourg will be added to a growing list of countries alongside Canada and 11 States in the US that have begun re-evalutating archaic drugs policies in which substances were banned and people deemed criminals and locked up for non-violent offences.


Luxembourg already benefits from the use of medical cannabis and has decriminalised small quantities of weed for personal recreational use so it seems the next logical step is for the country to continue making efforts towards complete legalisation of the plant.


Huge example

While it may not seem like a big deal given Luxembourg’s lack of numbers and powerful political presence, it serves as a huge example to other European countries that may also consider weed prohibition being a failed project.

As cannabis is more prevalent, potent and consumed than any other drug in Europe, Luxembourg paving the way in legally regulating and consuming weed sets a high bar for the rest of the EU, where approximately three million people use cannabis.


Although cultivation, supply and possession of cannabis are still criminal offences in the Netherlands, a softer approach to the plant evolved into the coffeeshop concept where cannabis sales are legalised and licensed by individual districts.


Initially set up to tempt young people away from experimenting with harder drugs, an evaluation of the Netherlands drug situation in 2009 found that users of cannabis were utilising coffeeshops as their main source of weed and the soft and hard drugs market remained separate entities, demonstrating that legalisation and regulation can work.

Similarly, although not tolerated by government authorities, countries such as Spain, Belgium, Germany and even the UK have recently been host to secret ‘cannabis clubs’, operating on the assumption that if one person can get away with cultivating one cannabis plant for individual use, then multiple people should not get prosecuted for cultivating multiple plants together for their own use.


These hazy business-ventures seem to be inevitably emerging regardless of the legalities of cannabis use, production and possession in the respective countries, it seems almost rational that governments should utilise them and potentially take control and make their own profit from them to benefit the wider society.


Scare stories

Portugal also decided to decriminalise all drug use a few years ago in 2001, with drug use, crime and drug-related illnesses falling dramatically since then and the predicted scare stories of an entire country consumed by drugs failed to transpire.

The decriminalisation in Portugal actually saw a reduction in drug arrests, reduced from 14,000 in 2000 to around 5,500 per year after the new laws were introduced in 2001, freeing up vital police resources in order to focus on violent crimes instead.

In countries like the UK, Germany and France, drug-related crime has actually risen exponentially despite the seemingly stricter laws.


Crime on the rise

In the UK there has been a worrying increase in stabbings in London, with much of that is to do with the drugs trade, where one of the most popular drugs sold on the street is still cannabis.


 After three murders in the space of 24 hours including two teenagers, a local resident describing the ‘gang-related’ crime in the area explained that “there’s more knife crime, more drugs” and another bystander stated that “there are drug dealers everywhere – you see them all the time” after admitting he now walks a different route home.


Individuals who want to use cannabis will do so regardless of the laws, and such people are already purchasing their weed on the black market and subsequently coming into contact with drug dealers who may be violent people and offer low quality buds with the potential to offer your everyday stoner more harmful drugs later on.

If the UK was to follow in Luxembourgs footsteps, taking the cultivation and sale of cannabis out of the hands of the criminal underworld and back into the government’s control where it could be regulated and taxed, this could consequentially alleviate a myriad of various issues and add a monumental amount of money to the economy.

Prisons across Europe are full of weed offenders, the majority of those are non-violent individuals and in 2017, there were 440,000 seizures of cannabis in the EU, amounting to 40% of the total number of drug seizures in the EU that year, with potency and price soaring each year from 2006-2016.

In seven years from 2010 to 2017 in the UK, cannabis warnings, cautions and prosecutions have reduced significantly despite usage continuing to increase, dropping from just over 80,000 police issued warnings in 2010 to around 30,000 in 2017.


Parliament motion

A recent parliament motion on cannabis legislation was tabled in 2018, where it was stated that the House of Commons believes that “the War on Drugs and the prohibition of cannabis has been a calamitous failure; recognises the dreadful social costs of the illegal cannabis market, including extreme violence in our communities, the accumulation of wealth by criminals gangs”.


They also highlighted the issues of “the health risks posed by the absence of any framework to regulate the safety or potency of these drugs; notes that banning cannabis does not reduce levels of drug use or drug-related harm, but unfairly stigmatises and criminalises young people who are doing no harm to others whilst tying up police resources which could be better used tackling harmful crimes”.


The hope among cannabis enthusiasts now is that the high pressure of a forward-thinking country such as Luxembourg turning to legalisation will spur on other EU member states to discuss the issue in a serious manner and even consider making a similar move.







1 person likes this

Share this post

Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0