Welcome to UK420

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more!

This message will be removed once you have signed in.


Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
tdogg01

300 cfl or 250 hps...any help?

hi all, i am planning to change my current grow from a normal soil grow, to a SOG setup

on this basis i was wondering if, for these flowering clones, a 300w cfl would yeild better than a 250w cfl(based on the wattage) however i know hps is better for flowering...

any help and advice would be much appreciated, i am semi new to this and not that knowledgeable on the lighting side...

thanks growers!

Share this post


Link to post

i take it you meant better than the 250 hps, not cfl.

i can imagine it would do, but i'm not a pro and you would have to look into something about the light spectrums or something like that :)

Share this post


Link to post

yes my bad

as corrected abouve i would like to know if a 300w cfl would yeild better than a 250w HPS

cheers bro

Share this post


Link to post

I very much doubt it.

Share this post


Link to post

I very much doubt it.

Totally agree CFL's just don't give off the same power as HPS

Share this post


Link to post

You can get respectable yields from CFLs. From my experience I know 200W of CFLs can easily produce 1-3oz dry. You should be able to out-do that considerably with an HPS and good growing conditions though.

In answer to your question- I'd go for the HPS. The 50W extra on the CFL I doubt is worth much in the grand scheme of things. Check the lumen outputs of both types and then bear in mind that HPS covers a much more easily available spectrum in terms of photosynthesis.

Edited by Doomah

Share this post


Link to post

ok im sold,im going to go for hps..

how many plants do you recon i can get flowering under there at any one time? bearing in mind they are going to be flowering straight from cuttings

cheers

Share this post


Link to post

hps! (or mh) would do better

peace out farmer boy

Share this post


Link to post

ok im sold,im going to go for hps..

how many plants do you recon i can get flowering under there at any one time? bearing in mind they are going to be flowering straight from cuttings

cheers

Anything more than four can get a bit cramped if you go for 6 litre pots, you could do many more if you used small pots, the yeild will be similar but less veg time is required.

Share this post


Link to post

Fluorescent is only for if you're stuck with very cramped conditions - and even then I would go for a 150 watt HPS ...

I can see the point of using fluorescent light over a large area for very young plants, maybe the 125 watt ones are more effective than non-optimally oriented low wattage CFLs, but can see no point at all in a fragile fluorescent light the size of a Party Seven that costs half as much as an HPS.

In the light of the 200 x 1 watt LED grow currently on the board, and the photos people have posted of their grows around 25 days, I'm revising my views about the tipping point when an HPS really starts wiping the floor with the opposition, but I will be sticking with 2 weeks / first repotting. (half a dozen household CFLs is my preferred option before that.)

LED isn't a remotely serious suggestion by the way.

I grow two trained plants under each of my 250s.

Edited by compostverte

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0